Economic Institutions
Economic institutions have resurfaced at the global level. After that, development economics became the focus of emphasis. a long period of time when they were alive and well Neoclassical economic ideas assumed functioning.1 Recent cross-country regression analysis – see, for example, Rodrik, Subramanian, and Trebbi (2002) claim that this is the case. The single most important factor is the quality of institutions. There is a significant gap in the economics of such countries. the developing world, which has experienced rapid growth and those who haven't yet
However, these insights are not always applicable. produced useful policy-making guides It is one of them. the thing to acknowledge the significance of institutional
It's one thing to say something is of high quality, but it's quite another to say what makes it so for quality and suggestions on how to improve I As a first step toward gaining a better understanding of
Three questions arise regarding institutions and their quality:
How are economic institutions formed, and how do they function?
function, and what are the consequences?
To begin answering, We need a working definition of these terms to answer these questions. economic institutions, as well as a related set of concepts.
Property rights, honest government, political stability, a dependable legal system, and competitive and free markets are all terms used by economists. What makes these so crucial to a country's economy? They create the ideal conditions for allocating limited resources.
The term "Economic Institutions" refers to two types of entities:
1. Specific government or private agencies or foundations devoted to collecting or studying economic data, or tasked with supplying a good or service critical to a country's economy. The Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) is the government's tax collection agency in the United States. Economic institutions include the Federal Reserve (the government's money-creation agency) and the National Bureau of Economic Research (a private research organization).
2. Economic institutions are well-established arrangements and structures that are parts of the culture or society, such as competitive markets, the banking system, children's allowances, customary tipping, and a property rights system.
Economists are interested not only in specific existing institutional agencies but also in the more intriguing question of why some institutions evolve while others do not. Why do institutions differ from country to country? Why do some institutions take centuries to establish themselves while others spring up in a matter of years? Why do some institutions emerge on their own in general society? When does the government step in to supervise societal institutions? Does the wording of a Constitution, or the structure of a country's legal or religious background, have an impact on the economic institutions that emerge in that country?
Definitions of economic institutions
1. The institutional context is largely missing from most neo-classical models of market exchange and human interaction. In the neo-classical view, rules, social norms and preferences are a given – thus understanding of economic institutions and human behavior that does not conform to economic notions of the ‘rational individual’ is left to other disciplines such as politics and sociology. Institutional economics may be seen to bring economics closer to other disciplines by arguing that individuals make choices that are at least partly culturally determined – thus moving beyond the longstanding focus of economics on individual utility as the main guide to resource allocation.
A. ‘Essentially, institutions are durable systems of established and embedded social rules and conventions that structure social interactions’ (Hodgson 2001 p.295) ‘A social institution is a regularity in social behavior that is agreed to by all members of society, specifies behavior in specific recurrent situations, and is either self-policed or policed by some external authority.’ (Schotter 1981, quoted in Langlois 1986 p.11) ‘Institutions are rules, enforcement characteristics of rules, and norms of behavior that structure repeated human interaction.’ (North 1989) ‘Institutions are ‘repetitive patterns of interaction through which society undertakes certain functions.’ (King 1976) ‘Wide sense: persistent groups of norms of behavior which serve collectively valued purposes; or in the narrow sense of, a set of rules to facilitate co-ordination via allowing expectations to form.’ (Nabli & Nugent 1989)
would accept the idea that institutions comprise norms, regulations, and laws that establish the ‘rules of the game’ – that is, that the condition and modify the behavior of individuals and groups so that their actions become more predictable to others. They do so through both formal rules that include laws and contracts and, as well as through informal means such as social norms and conventions that evolve over time. This use of ‘institution’ is quite different from that where it is taken as synonymous with ‘organization’.
B. Institutions and policies
All policy changes can be seen as changing the rules of the game. If a tariff level is reduced from 20% to 10%, for example, the conditions – and perhaps thus the ‘rules’ – governing imports have changed. Is this, then, an institutional change? And if so, are all economic policies effectively institutions? Institutions are defined as helping form stable expectations, hence institutions can only be changed infrequently if they are to fulfill this function. Institutions operate at a deeper level and are, in effect, constitutional; they establish the framework of rules within which more routine decisions take place. In the case of the import tariff, for example, the institution is that which empowers the state to set such tariffs. Thus, continuing the example, a country that binds its tariffs in accordance with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) could be seen as changing an institution. This in turn modifies the expectations of those engaged in international trade: the WTO norms set limits to tariffs and discourage quantitative controls on trade.
Institutions can also be seen as constitutional, they set the rules by which the game is played; it is this that distinguishes them from the wider set of economic policies – see Box B. By narrowing the definition to economic institutions, those institutions that perform economic functions are covered; of these, three sets can be identified: • establishing and protecting property rights;
• facilitating transactions; and,
• permitting economic co-operation and organization.
Table 1 presents examples of the institutions that perform these functions, together with the agencies both formal and informal that regulate such functions. It will be noted that some of the institutions that have economic functions may not exist primarily for economic reasons – for example, councils of elders.
The definition of economic institutions can be expanded and discussed by asking three key questions about institutions, namely:
• How are institutions, which affect economic growth and its distribution established, sustained, and changed?
• What determines their effective functioning? How is this related to the social, cultural, and political matrix from which they arise and in which they operate? How much do they depend upon formal endorsement by the state?
• How do institutional interactions influence economic growth, the pattern of growth, and, specifically, the possibilities for pro-poor growth?
How are economic institutions formed? Institutions emerge in two ways: either informally through repeated interactions between individuals or organizations that establish expected norms of behavior; or else formally through deliberate design. In the latter case, it may be a government that establishes the institution, or it might be an initiative from a private enterprise or civil society. In both cases, it can be argued that institutions are created and evolve in response to the uncertainty, risk, and information costs associated with living and transacting in an imperfect world. Institutions are thus rational mechanisms designed to cope with the imperfections of markets, including the asymmetry of the information held by different actors, the problems that principals have in ensuring that their agents pursue the same goals, etc. This explains why seemingly ‘irrational’ and inefficient institutions such as sharecropping have persisted as ways to solve such imperfections.
Whatever the origin of the institution, the more widely it is recognized the better it will function and such recognition reaches its maximum expression when the norm is endorsed by the state as legally binding. Not all institutions require the support of governments, but some do in order to remove ambiguity and to provide legal backing for the norms in question. Institutions may be seen as public goods in that their benefits (and costs) are shared by all in the economy, no matter who took the trouble to establish them.2 This suggests that many institutions will require action by governments to create and implement the norm.
Most institutions are not lightly changed, even when clearly imperfect or outdated. Institutions are valued for the predictability that they bring to the system; frequent change and experimentation to established norms is thus not usually encouraged. Moreover, particular institutions can confer rights and advantages to particular groups in society who will use their power to prevent changes that undermine their advantages. There is thus the possibility of path dependency in that once certain institutions are in place, then other norms and behaviors ensue, thus reinforcing patterns of development and restricting the range of options for policy.
Discussion of new institutions or changes to institutions is often intense, parties recognize the implications of creating new ‘rules for the game or of changing them and each will fight for their own interests. The political economy of institutional change is therefore important in that they may evolve to confer privileges on particular groups, whether or not the institutions are efficient and effective for society as a whole, and once in place may be difficult to change. An additional consideration is that those administrating the rules may also resist change simply owing to the thereof.
How do economic institutions function?
An important point is that the functioning of an institution is not necessarily to be inferred from its form. For example, very similar institutions exist in many countries that govern the collection of bad debts, but how long it may take to recover such debts can vary greatly, depending on the details of administrative requirements and the efficacy of the legal system. Similarly, there are often significant differences in the extent to which property owners feel secure in their rights, even when the form of entitlement may be the same. The study of institutions thus requires detailed investigation of actual functioning, rather than merely recording the apparent form. Functioning may be determined by deeper underlying norms in society on matters such as the extent of generalized trust, and individual freedom versus obligations to wider collectives. More generally, then, institutions are often embedded in social and cultural characteristics of the particular context.
How do institutions affect economic growth and poverty reduction?
The functioning of institutions potentially affects three factors that help determine economic growth, thus:3
• Investment: when property rights are secure, owners of capital are more likely to invest, all other things being equal. If it is easy to trade, obtain credit, retain a reasonable share of the profits (that is, without excessive taxation), and insure against risks, investment is again encouraged. Investment may also be stimulated when establishing companies or more informal economic groups, (and the organization of their functioning) is relatively straightforward.
• Technical innovation: again, secure intellectual property rights are likely to promote private investment in research and development of innovations.
• Economic organization is likely to be more effective and efficient, delivering the benefits of specialization and economies of scale where they apply, when institutions facilitate transactions and co-operation between individuals, whether informal companies or less formal co-operatives. It is easy to imagine that there will be reinforcing interactions between the factors. For example, economies that generate technical innovations readily and where the economic organization is efficient are likely to be seen as having a good business environment and consequently likely to attract investment, thus it may well be that sets of institutions function in synergy to generate growth.
Institutions are also likely to have a profound influence on the pattern of economic growth and the distribution of rewards within economies and societies – and thereby affect levels of poverty. Property rights will clearly be important since they assign entitlements to factors of production and may also affect the bargaining power of different groups in society. More subtle are the ways in which institutions governing transactions and economic co-operation allow those without immediate access to factors of production to obtain credit, rent land, trade, and form small companies or co-operatives, and thereby earn their livelihoods.
References
Langlois, Richard N., 1986, ‘The New Institutional Economics: an introductory essay’, in Richard N. Langlois (Ed.), Economics as a process: essays in the New Institutional Economics. Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press. North, D C., 1989, ‘Institutions and economic growth: a historical introduction’, World Development, 17 (9), 1319–32. Nabi, M. K. & J. B. Nugent, 1989, ‘The New Institutional Economics and its applicability to development’, World Development, 17 (9), 1333– 1347.
Rodrik, Dani, Arvind Subramanian & Francesco Trebbi, 2002, ‘Institutions rule the primacy of institutions over integration and geography in economic development’, IMF Working Paper, WP/02/189. Washington DC, International Monetary Fund.
Hodgson, Geoffrey M., 2001, How economics forgot history. London, Routledge. King, Roger, 1976, Farmers co-operatives in northern Nigeria, Ph.D. thesis. Reading, University of Reading.